From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.89]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15lDZZ-0005n8-00 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:01:46 -0400 Received: from blazie.demon.co.uk ([212.229.180.249] helo=tim02) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15lDZZ-000LYh-0V for speakup@braille.uwo.ca; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:01:46 +0100 From: "Tim Burgess" To: Subject: RE: kernel compile gone wrong. Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 19:07:19 +0100 Message-ID: <000c01c1445a$9c4d46a0$f9b4e5d4@tim02> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20010923120654.D329@linserver.megsinet.net> Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Reply-To: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi, I'm having a bad day - I've just sent a message to the list describing my network and didn't include the Windows 2000 server. This server runs DHCP and WINS, but no DNS (mainly because I don't know how to configure it). I guess I'm suffering from MS-itis - I'm used to wizard-driven installation where you can make some (semi)-intelligent guesses and get it running. I'm finding the Linux thing interesting, but very confusing because it's such a different way of doing things. Sorry to be a time-wasting pain in the ass. Tim -----Original Message----- From: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca]On Behalf Of Gregory Nowak Sent: 23 September 2001 18:07 To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca Subject: Re: kernel compile gone wrong. In order to use the speakup 0.10a tar ball, You need to downgrade to kernel 2.4.6. 0.10a only works with kernels 2.2.18-2.4.6. Greg On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 03:38:43PM +0100, Tim Burgess wrote: > Hi, > > I've read the cvs documentation, but I don't have an internet connection > active on my Linux box at this time - my access to my ISP is via a networked > Windows NT box (OK, I know you guys are gonna hate me now - grin!). This > means, I would guess, that the cvs route is now closed to me until I get my > Linux dial-up issue sorted. I've crated a new source tree based on 2.4.9 > and patched it for ac10, so can I manually patch using the SpeakUp tar ball > as I did for 0.09, or is this really a kiss of death? > > Thanks for the help so far folks, just this last hurdle to go and I should > be there with speech on an up-to-date kernel. If I can get this far then I > can progress to Internet access from this box using my ISDN card and a Squid > proxy. Should be fun! > > cheers. > > Tim > > > -----Original Message----- > From: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca > [mailto:speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca]On Behalf Of Steve Holmes > Sent: 23 September 2001 14:00 > To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca > Subject: RE: kernel compile gone wrong. > > > Since you have the speakup 0.10a archive, look in there for a README.cvs > or CVS and read that. It explains a bit more about the checkout process > mentioned above. Like mentioned elseware, do *NOT* put the old speakup > into the kernel source tree. Use the fresh kernel source before running > checkout. > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Shaun Oliver wrote: > > > I can. you don't need to get the tar.gz archive. > > all you need is the kernel sources from ftp://ftp.kernel.org and then the > > checkout script from > > ftp://linux-speakup.org . > > then you do chmod 755 checkout to make it executeable, > > and run it. > > after of course you've unpacked the kernel source tree. > > > > > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Tim Burgess wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried compiling the 2.4.9 kernel without the patch, so you might have > > > answered my question as well. However, I'm confused about the "CVS" > > > reference for SpeakUp. I've been out of the SpeakUp loop for a while > (I'm > > > running 0.09 under kernel 2.2.16 at the moment). The only SpeakUp code > I > > > can find on the web/FTP site is a tar.gz. The installation > documentation > > > that I have seems to indicate that all I need to do is unpack the file > into > > > /usr/src, change to the SpeakUp directory and execute ./install. It did > > > occur to me that I might (or might not) need to do the patch as per the > 0.09 > > > version. > > > > > > Dazed and confused - can you advise? > > > > > > P.S. Just to show that I'm still a complete newbie, how do I delete a > > > directory containing files and sub-dirs in one go? > > > > > > Cheers. > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca > > > [mailto:speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca]On Behalf Of Frank Carmickle > > > Sent: 23 September 2001 12:18 > > > To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > > Subject: Re: kernel compile gone wrong. > > > > > > > > > Shaun > > > > > > Your errors are with incompatible versions of speakup and a kernel I do > > > believe. Looks like you tried building current cvs against 2.4.4. I > > > don't see any reason why you would want to build 2.4.4 at this point. I > > > suggest that you build 2.4.9ac10. This can be accomplished by getting > the > > > 2.4.9 source tarball and the ac10 patch which can be found at > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/linux-2.4/2.4.9/patch-2.4. > > > 9-ac10.gz > > > To patch the ac patch make sure the the 2.4.9 source is in > /usr/src/linux > > > then make a link to this called linux.ac This can be done by 'ln -s > linux > > > linux.ac' from with in the /usr/src dir. Then from /usr/src do > 'patch -p0 > > > > > it. Then use the checkout script to apply cvs of speakup. > > > > > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Shaun Oliver wrote: > > > > > > > ok I'm man enough to admit it. I've got a major problem I think. > > > > or at least a minor one I can't sort out for some reason. > > > > I don't know exactly why, but I seem to have a problem with my kernel > > > > compile. I'm trying to compile kernel 2.4.4 for slackware 7.1 and I > run > > > > into some trouble when it gets to the vt.o part. > > > > I've attached a copy of my image.log compressed of course to see if > anyone > > > > else either has had this problem or knows of a way to figure it out. > > > > > > -- > > > Frank Carmickle > > > phone: 412 761-9568 > > > email: frankiec@dryrose.com > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Speakup mailing list > > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Speakup mailing list > > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Speakup mailing list > > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup