From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-server6.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.43]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17sryH-0005VT-00 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:39:25 -0400 Received: from inspiron5000e (6532244hfc28.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.244.28]) by smtp-server6.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g8LLdSu7010468 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:39:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000b01c261b7$5d09ada0$1cf42041@inspiron5000e> From: "David Poehlman" To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020920085936.02589150@198.144.194.210> <000b01c260fc$f838eae0$41529718@nt.charterne.com> <15755.47440.881040.969386%akp@eznet.net> <20020921023906.GA6009@dalek> <15756.20399.89152.281507%akp@eznet.net> <001201c261b2$d605ea20$6f11ba3f@rgallegos> Subject: Re: NFB Net goes linux! Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 17:39:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: yes, because they deserve bashing. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raul A. Gallegos" To: Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 5:07 PM Subject: Re: NFB Net goes linux! Does everything have to be turned into an nfb bashing session? -- If you perceive that there are four possible ways in which a procedure can go wrong, and circumvent these, then a fifth way will promptly develop. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ann Parsons" To: Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 5:53 AM Subject: Re: NFB Net goes linux! > Hi all, > > Well, now, old Buddy, one would think that his motives would be fueled > by logic. If one were going to buy or be given apparatus for > maintaining the email lists, web and so on of an organization, one > would desire the best equipment, but one would also make sure that it > was configurable by those who were going to use it. It makes no sense > to have equipment in one's office that one can not configure by > oneself. Even if the learning curve were steep, it would make sense > that any equipment should be flexible enough to be configured by the > blind and not the sighted. But then, who ever said members of that > organization thought logically or had a modicum of common sense? _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup