From: "Thomas D. Ward" <tward1978@earthlink.net>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: RH or Debian:why?
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 00:39:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000a01c31064$ca89ac20$d90b9541@tward1978> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305012326500.3444-100000@rmnet>
Hi, I can certainly tell you the features that are important to me, and why
I use Red Hat aposed to another such as Slack or Debian.Here are my top Red
Hat features in no particular order.
1. Red Hat has several methods of installation which often times is
invaluible. You have the kickstart install which is a text file with
commands which allows Red Hat to be installed automatically without you
having to answer any questions, and installed the way you like including
formatting, making partitions, etc. Another install method is over a telnet
connection. This is vary helpful when speakup can't be used, and you need an
accessible way to install. The last install method is by linking two
computers together by the serial ports, and doing a terminal install. Also
helpful when speakup can't be used for install.
2. Red Hat is a vary large distrobution, and you can get an rpm binary of a
program for just about anything. some comercial programs, businesses, target
Red Hat users, and won't garentee there product on other distros such as
Debian.
3. Red Hat was one of the first distros to come compiled with gcc 3.x, and
any programs compiled with 3.x will not work with libs build with older
versions of gcc. Debian has been dragging it's feet on getting with the
program and getting a distro built with gcc 3.2 which they need to be to be
compatible with new programs.
4. Red Hat has one of the best hardware manigement and configuration tools I
have found. The kudzu program basically sets up all of your hardware it can
find, and in the case of an os compatible sound card you can use sndconfig
to configure your sound.
5. I need X-windows for allot of things a5. Red Hat's X-Windows
configuration tools are unmatched. It will probe for your monitor, vidio
card, and attempt to configure X all by itself with a few minor questions.
I've found Debians setup for X to be a nightmare, and far out dated.
6. Red Hat is vary easy to turn on and off services. You don't have to edit
files to turn on say apache. Just type service httpd start and it
automatically comes up.
You can even specify what run levels you want a service to run in weather it
is 3 5 or whatever.
7. Red Hat has become a well known distro at IBM, Del, Intel, just to name
names. They are investing in that distro, and you can expect it to succeed
while less known distros become less used, and less known.Some small less
known distros may die out leaving the popular ones to stay standing.
Summary
I think Red Hat's popularity stems from good marketing, attempting to add
the ease of use of MS Windows, and target the group of people who want
something like Windows, but isn't Windows.
Debian is a traditional sort of Linux which doesn't try to cash in by making
a distro to compete with Windows, one that is a do it yourself os, and
targets their users, and if anyone joins that group they say, "good." If not
they say, "oh, well..."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
Which distribution? Steven M. Sawczyn
` Darragh
` Lorenzo Prince
` Steven M. Sawczyn
` Lorenzo Prince
` Travis Siegel
` Saqib Shaikh
` Doug
` Thomas D. Ward
` Steven M. Sawczyn
` Patrick Turnage
` Message length, was: " Kirk Reiser
` Steven M. Sawczyn
` Charles Crawford
` Chuck Hallenbeck
` Charles Crawford
` Luke Davis
` Ann Parsons
` Gregory Nowak
` Lorenzo Prince
` Janina Sajka
` RH or Debian:why? Patrick Turnage
` Thomas D. Ward
` rmann
` Thomas D. Ward [this message]
` Doug
` William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209
` Thomas D. Ward
` Ann Parsons
` Chuck Hallenbeck
` Thomas D. Ward
` Thomas D. Ward
` Ann Parsons
` dosemu and freedos Charles Crawford
` Alex Snow
` Thomas D. Ward
` RH or Debian:why? Lorenzo Prince
` Thomas D. Ward
` Lorenzo Prince
` Tommy Moore
` Janina Sajka
` Message length, was: Re: Which distribution? Adam Myrow
` Ann Parsons
` Janina Sajka
` Janina Sajka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000a01c31064$ca89ac20$d90b9541@tward1978' \
--to=tward1978@earthlink.net \
--cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).