From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com ([216.148.227.87]) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 176IhG-0005sb-00 for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 18:17:07 -0400 Received: from mycomputer ([24.62.38.105]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20020510221638.KDGZ25765.rwcrmhc54.attbi.com@mycomputer> for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 22:16:38 +0000 Message-ID: <000901c1f870$29343f00$02263e18@mycomputer> From: "Igor Gueths" To: Subject: i/o Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 18:15:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca Errors-To: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi all. When you kill Speakup with prn-screen, does this return control = of the serial port to the kernel? Bc in playing around with programs = such as emacspeak, I have realized that this isn't the case. I'm = currently sifting through the code to see what I can find in terms of = i/o, but does anyone know if killing Speakup returns control of the port = to the kernel or not the way it is already? Thanks!