From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rdsl-0017.tor.pathcom.com ([207.188.66.17] helo=interfree.ca) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AFvo0-0008Ub-00 for ; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 08:28:40 -0500 Received: from Spooler by interfree.ca (Mercury/32 v3.32) ID MO00080B; 1 Nov 03 08:28:35 -0500 Received: from spooler by interfree.ca (Mercury/32 v3.32); 1 Nov 03 08:27:53 -0500 Received: from M019005 (192.168.1.1) by interfree.ca (Mercury/32 v3.32) ID MG00080A; 1 Nov 03 08:27:44 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c3a07b$f10fc530$6501a8c0@ism.can.ibm.com> From: "Rejean Proulx" To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." References: Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 08:27:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: Possible Mailman configuration problem on this list? X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rejean Proulx , "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 13:28:41 -0000 You probably have a good point. I am in the middle of a huge conversion so I thought maybe it had something to do with me and forgot all about it. I notice that I am getting several double posts from this list. Rejean Proulx Visit my family at http://interfree.ca MSN is: rejp@rogers.com Ham License VA3REJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209" To: Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:38 PM Subject: Possible Mailman configuration problem on this list? > Hi all, > > I notice that when Luke replied to Rejean, Rejean got a copy, as well > as the list. It isn't very likely that Luke meant to do that. So, using > Pine, I hit R, was asked the usual question about including the text of > the message being replied to, prompted whether I wanted to use the > reply-to address rather than the From: address, I said yes. Usually, that > would be that, but I was then asked if I wanted to reply to all > recipients. Normally, I only get prompted for that if I say no to the > previous prompt about using the reply-to address. > > What y'all think? > -- > > > Bill in Denver > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup