public inbox for speakup@linux-speakup.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@nc.rr.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Subject: RE: 16k voices
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:34:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000501c37e35$18a83870$6401a8c0@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002901c37d09$8b7febe0$0100007f@carolina.rr.com>

*raises eyebrows* really now? I was under the apparent mistaken
impression that via voice was out of the question for redhat 9. does
anyone else have experience with this? Because I have had very good
exposure to via voice, and personally I have always been satisfied with
via voice's quality, understandability, and clarity. If anyone can help
me install via voice on redhat 9, I would be more than greatful.

Thanks,
Sina

-----Original Message-----
From: speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-admin@braille.uwo.ca]
On Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 6:51 AM
To: speakup@braille.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: 16k voices


What about trying festival lite?  Or even viavoice.

now, granted, if you are on Redhat, then I understand viavoice to be a
pain to install...  matt Campbell did it for me, but he practicly from
what I understood, partially had to recompile the source to match the
kurnel in redhat 9.


these are just a few options though that are free.


Chris.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@nc.rr.com>
To: <speakup@braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:12 PM
Subject: 16k voices


> Hello, I read a few earlier posts on this and other lists about some 
> 16k voices availible for linux. I was wondering what would be 
> availible, and if 16k voices are truly the highest quality availible 
> these days. I must say I am interested in software and not hardware 
> solutions and synths. The main constraint being price right now; 
> however, I would be open to any advice and information, but I would 
> greatily appreciate to know about any 16k voices and which software 
> speech packages can support them, and do it with ease and little 
> difficulty?
>
> Thanks so much everyone,
> Sina
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup@braille.uwo.ca 
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup


_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup@braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup




  reply	other threads:[~ UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
 Sina Bahram
 ` Chris
   ` Sina Bahram [this message]
     ` Janina Sajka
       ` Sina Bahram
 ` Jacob Schmude
   ` Janina Sajka
     ` Jacob Schmude
       ` Mike Arrigo
         ` Richard Wells
     ` Jacob Schmude
       ` Janina Sajka
     ` Sina Bahram
       ` Janina Sajka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000501c37e35$18a83870$6401a8c0@quantum' \
    --to=sbahram@nc.rr.com \
    --cc=speakup@braille.uwo.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).