From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ylpvm01-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.32] helo=ylpvm01.prodigy.net) by speech.braille.uwo.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DkOMD-0001dr-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:38:41 -0400 Received: from main (adsl-69-234-179-150.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net [69.234.179.150]) by ylpvm01.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5KFcT3H012447; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:38:37 -0400 From: "Jim Grimsby" To: , "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'" Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 08:38:36 -0700 Message-ID: <000401c575ae$22cb3830$230110ac@main> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <000f01c575ad$28bbde80$f342d4da@jaffar57b5aa42> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Debian netinst CD with speakup X-BeenThere: speakup@braille.uwo.ca X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Id: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:38:41 -0000 Hi, try booting it using the speakup26 kernel instead Hth -----Original Message----- From: speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces@braille.uwo.ca] On Behalf Of jaffar@jeffstudio.net Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 8:31 AM To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux. Subject: Re: Debian netinst CD with speakup Hi I don't know if this is an appropriate thread on which to discuss this on, but the netinst Cd would not boot and I seem to get no response either from the CD or when i typed in the speakup command at the boot prompt. I have set the bios on my pc to boot up with my Cd drive, so I can't exactly be sure what is really happening here. Fedora and slackware, for example did spin during the boot up and after the text commands for each was typed in, but i got no response from the debian netinst CD at all, no spinning to speak off. Don't know what to do next. Cheers! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Stivers" To: ; "Speakup Distribution List" Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 7:47 PM Subject: Re: Debian netinst CD with speakup > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:05:03 AM -0400, Charles Hallenbeck wrote: >> The disk installs Sarge/testing, but Sarge is no longer testing, >> since it was promoted to stable on June 6. Testing is now called >> something else. So what do I get if I now do an install with that CD? >> Do I get Sarge/stable? or the new testing? Will there be an >> opportunity to specify which I want during the install? perhaps by >> dropping to a shell prompt and editing something? I will be doing two >> more installations later this week and hope to avoid surprises. > > Short answer: If you have the 3.1r0a CD just install it and it'll > work. > > Long answer: I think the answer depends on exactly which revision of > the netinst-speakup cd you have. If you downloaded it a while back you > might have a copy that was for the testing ditribution, but if you > have the 3.1r0a version then what you have is for stable. You can of > course edit /etc/apt/sources.list after you install and specify > stable/testing/unstable or sarge/etch/sid whichever you prefer. As an > interesting note, according to the debian top brass who are supposed > to know about these things, changing entries in /etc/apt/sources.list > is not the canonical way to choose which version you are running. I am > not completely clear on the details, but it looks like you can have > all three of stable, testing, and unstable listed in sources.list and > then choose the default release you want by putting the line > APT::Default-Release "stable"; in /etc/apt/apt.conf. This file will > not exist by default. I think this might be a good idea because it > allows you to run selected packages from testing or unstable while > keeping the bulk of your system running stable. It is rather an > advanced option, so as the saying goes "if you break it you get to > keep all the pieces." > > - -- > "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. > Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, > by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan > > Thomas Stivers e-mail: stivers_t@tomass.dyndns.org > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFCtqzd5JK61UXLur0RA4WJAJ4h7DE6zPXsoRIXs0ZQd2hZURrzngCbBx9W > tv/kn+eJlDdcEThdSo2cHk4= > =ism0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > _______________________________________________ Speakup mailing list Speakup@braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup