From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from charger.oldcity.dca.net([207.245.82.76]) (3544 bytes) by braille.uwo.ca via smail with P:esmtp/D:aliases/T:pipe (sender: ) id for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 17:20:17 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2 built 1999-Sep-5) Received: from wang (ppp-216-158-5-55.cust.oldcity.dca.net [216.158.5.55]) by charger.oldcity.dca.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/DCANET) with SMTP id RAA22922 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 17:20:16 -0400 Message-ID: <000201c025bd$c5f9c120$37059ed8@wang> From: "Victor Tsaran" To: References: <3.0.6.32.20000922225521.007db9a0@mail.ufw2.com> Subject: Re: New user encountering problems Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 15:59:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 List-Id: I always suggest to take RedHat kernel as it is and just load modules. Best, Vic ******* ******* ******* have you thought of visiting Cybertsar's Internet Kingdom? It is still alive! Here is the URL: http://nimbus.ocis.temple.edu/~vtsaran/ ******* ******* ******* ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brent Harding" To: Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:55 PM Subject: Re: New user encountering problems > I've liked debian for awhile, but tons of stuff won't compile, because the > locations of files are a little screwy. Why put stuff in non standard > places I don't know. How does one configure a redhat kernel when compiling > anyways? I'm thinking about using it some time, suppose I need the 3c59x > driver support for networking, can I config it like a normal kernel or does > redhat have tools to make this easier? > At 11:24 PM 9/22/00 -0400, you wrote: > >Hi > > It is possible to build a speakup kernel from the Red Hat source > >RPM. Just skip the patches that can't find their files, they don't apply > >to the i386. > > However, the kernel will build, but unless you use a rh supplied > >config, your modules will have unresolved symbols all over the place. I > >don't think speakup agrees with some of the patches RH applied to their > >kernel rpm, for it is not a clean source. They've applied all sorts of > >stuff that are beta, or even alpha. Not wise, I believe they do it to try > >to get their distro to support more hardware. > > Personally, I think slackware is the best, closely followed by > >debian. > > > >On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Kirk Wood wrote: > > > >> I believe this is a kernel problem. Once the kernel starts expanding (you > >> get the loading and the dots, then the kernel quickly takes over. My guess > >> is that you used the kernell source provided by RedHat. If you did, then > >> you should download the kernel (possibly from kernel.org) and apply the > >> patch compile, etc.) RedHat doesn't provide the complete kernel and as a > >> result the built images don't work correct. Sorry I can't give you more > >> complete details. Just that it is common to discover you can't build a > >> working kernel with speakup from the RedHat source package. > >> > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Speakup mailing list > >Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speakup mailing list > Speakup@braille.uwo.ca > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup