From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 047NIBNb032251 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:18:11 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id EE2EC2029F61; Thu, 7 May 2020 23:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast05.extmail.prod.ext.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.55.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E99D5202683D for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 23:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F76D80CDAF for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 23:18:08 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dkim.mimecast.com; s=201903; t=1588893487; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=m4yLSsVV0plWUgaym9CWbSrWUqVzRdCNcp2x//Ujc9Q=; b=C60WohnCIgtCXJL3sjySfQq7/ZwQRLOunL65ndH84s7zXkHe3PBjQ9hnueIEnBneUq1oCB WYgjUIIbRX6JNPgcPIwfVrmGTMCv+2f2xDe2Z5noTs6DW6DauChHediTUSUQnRKBV740gx eEILBrKbBebnm+5ZOYx56r4uG3Pd5zuPQel25GTITt1UnxA3h/kEe/hoaqF5rVfYHq/WsU 30OAGCMuQpJ6kKm4WO0mq+eq1fBzuatW4qJqRfu2SBQ9cNjUelkF7FKgPafHBIcE/TmuYU G3+axXwEFn7BKaHWh9pinGsfg0INKLNBFR8sB+pwWRKOcLlnZZk1naz3St8mVw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=201903; d=dkim.mimecast.com; t=1588893487; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IGto/04eysLfFamTBmLx9vBAY55+tfcLc0R57IMBqHpyztq63xvioKevpB3Wvk/wlAFUPW g2J00K6PNG2pVCMuKYUZmxw49zy/GdVtRljorKXqiQ7QykT1GrxlZ2LYxLHwrZ5987LtWQ krytoXV0V8VW0ALMAfpyi3D5pEnJIS9tx3XP8wPpJ2mP5jeoly73WpcEtFZJNxNxTpu4wd YC1WjKbYlkuh1loB52s/PvQcTX/BOlvDcSdycGtrzZsKKDfZnSWNyYsvLzbjFNXGVNAlkD PFSJBH5FW3x3+n3iSI7wOyeX/3mBPllXfizF5ZK8gCHBQXI+H2hP7UMlTAZYOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; relay.mimecast.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (relay.mimecast.com: domain of jdashiel@panix.com designates 166.84.1.89 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jdashiel@panix.com Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-9-Bzr-r8vWOBqrReUNvnDq9A-1; Thu, 07 May 2020 19:18:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Bzr-r8vWOBqrReUNvnDq9A-1 Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49J8Wx0RNLz1VR0 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:18:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by panix1.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20712) id 49J8Ww6W3nzcbc; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panix1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49J8Ww63SpzcbW for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 19:18:04 -0400 To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: Re: Anything besides vanilla Arch? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <008e01d62459$7b0c9600$7125c200$@GMAIL.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (relay.mimecast.com: domain of jdashiel@panix.com designates 166.84.1.89 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jdashiel@panix.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com id 047NIBNb032251 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 23:18:11 -0000 The project is now called tarch and it along with talkingarch are both vanilla arch installs. On Thu, 7 May 2020, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 15:48:56 > From: Linux for blind general discussion > To: Linux for blind general discussion > Subject: Re: Anything besides vanilla Arch? > > Hi Brandt, > > There was a project (now discontibued, I think) called TalkingArch, > initially maintained by Chris Brannon then by Ky le, cf.: > https://talkingarch.tk/about.php > > It has two "successors": > > 1. Tarch, maintained by Deedra Waters and Michael Taboada: > https://tarch.org/ endorsed by the past maintainers. > > 2. TakingArch or talking-arch maintained by Alexander Epaneshnikov, cf.: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TalkingArch > https://github.com/alex19EP/talking-arch > > I can't compare these two projects but assume that both are worth a try. > > Cheers, > Didier > -- > Dider Spaier > Maintainer of the Slint distribution > > Le 07/05/2020 ? 12:22, Linux for blind general discussion a ?crit?: > > Hi there, > > > > I have been running Ubuntu and Ubuntu spins for a while now and am looking > > for something else for a change. I have installed vanilla Arch before, but > > that was when my system was only running Linux. Due to the work I do, NVDA > > certified expert, Training and tech support, et al, I have to have a Windows > > instance to boot in to. I am not comfortable installing vanilla Arch on here > > at this time. > > > > Are there any Arch based distros we can actually install without sited help? > > > > Warm regards/Groetnis/herzliche Gr??e, > > > > Brandt Steenkamp > > > > Contact/Kontak/Kontakt > > > > Twitter: www.twitter.com/brandtsteenkamp > > > > > > Skype: brandt.steenkamp007 > > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > --