From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wBECcOmB025776 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:38:24 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 7A9C960139; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx19.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7193A6012D for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E48307D915 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D1F220AA for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:37:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by panix1.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20712) id 5998014B64; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:37:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panix1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5454914B62 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:37:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:37:51 -0500 To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: Re: minix 3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, Sender IP whitelisted by DNSRBL, ACL 216 matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:37:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:37:52 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'166.84.1.89' DOMAIN:'mailbackend.panix.com' HELO:'mailbackend.panix.com' FROM:'jdashiel@panix.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -2.301 (RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_PASS) 166.84.1.89 mailbackend.panix.com 166.84.1.89 mailbackend.panix.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.110.48 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:38:24 -0000 No clue on accessibility, but yes I have heard of minix in one of its earlier incarnations. For a while I worked in a Naval Research facility and the management in the department in which I work decided to install minix base-wide. The result was disasterous and nearly got our department shut down. On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:11:50 > From: Linux for blind general discussion > To: blinux-list@redhat.com > Subject: minix 3 > > Has anyone here ever used or installed minix 3 and how accessible is it? > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > --