From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v5FE4HAG007682 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:04:17 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 9FB897A24E; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98BDB7A254 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com (mail-it0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA593C04B941 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:04:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com AA593C04B941 Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=southernprince73@gmail.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com AA593C04B941 Authentication-Results: mx1.redhat.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="EsrjTN2s" Received: by mail-it0-f51.google.com with SMTP id m47so11516869iti.0 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent :mime-version; bh=2YyxvI9OMas+jxhAFnVG80Emjx1/H41RmaxWi2Q0Ddc=; b=EsrjTN2snCt8wEN7RiYsxgnHyPwLoJEWSwaLH5IRKwBnJMnC7Hm8WcsVTwCPKB9/0A LuPbDrN1/suscZnQljODjr0uJuMUTDJYILfMxgWPbWvg9FeHSzpOYuTopKL/Bq8UXiXD 1yO3Pn9gUZNhLt+aga4yQRaR6S8sfu0+HtcVtpjdqMdTZh1Hkb3Dy2y2prSfl3R4vd/M QvLYagUzsrroWc6yQVz2qwQ15tkY9PHSZUbsuULvOVgzrVHzlMnLKBE3737VPtRaHBJK 8PwB4psJZJOgiFHqPxDbV2e7YxoRI+jEcBS6BmCAtAysTTzzjw5Gmw2q3jQtIwBuTo8/ 1hUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=2YyxvI9OMas+jxhAFnVG80Emjx1/H41RmaxWi2Q0Ddc=; b=T3bl0osAfjbDJOHmBaZFNgzkbAwfF+icThDovUjQyjuTMhspehxtjH1YXKOVACypKT RAy/2/L/iub7DNnFtkD1nIQjs/B4wadl5BBVnlcsNzWPKjTcVqmC2esv4dUYnQbJTcrx lzPneH/QcsPa/YYbXXjQrMtQWpBNuN52yrjE+KKfWTZaj/tVwuPPLsP3DBgsgXdJIgU2 PmTKBIWZX4PSvvjNv9gR4IfOceuiSgxMMGvbR173HcPehGKeYMz+iU2FOES1NaLlJzmA 9bZ7oavb0I0+XqL0x29B31NJ4M5se48F5jyRP2lCOnUXNVCzB+RU5xZTEGkgaTsU/mV2 5G+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxpRJ0bgsc8k0xEm2y2x7JS9s/5iZNRP/OHf2eBS5yjncmr9kin 7zWBm8QkN7NHHZu6 X-Received: by 10.36.225.142 with SMTP id n136mr5378950ith.64.1497535453443; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (97-127-184-126.cdrr.qwest.net. [97.127.184.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q83sm120068ioi.52.2017.06.15.07.04.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Mark Peveto Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:03:31 -0500 (CDT) X-X-Sender: markp@southernprince To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: re: working with nano In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 211 2017-05-04) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:04:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:04:14 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'209.85.214.51' DOMAIN:'mail-it0-f51.google.com' HELO:'mail-it0-f51.google.com' FROM:'southernprince73@gmail.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.52 (BAYES_50, DCC_REPUT_00_12, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_PASS) 209.85.214.51 mail-it0-f51.google.com 209.85.214.51 mail-it0-f51.google.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.31 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:04:17 -0000 Nope, it didn't pull anything down. Said no packages will be upgraded installed or removed. Did as root, too. Note here that I am not using Vinux. this is debian. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Everything happens after coffee! On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > Actually Mark, if you were to run aptitude and if it says it cannot find any > packages, it may reference packages with nano in its description. You can then > paste those in your next apt-get or aptitude. Otherwise, a more drastic step > would be useing a question mark, as in > aptitude install nano? > You would probably need to completely become root, but you may also get alot > of extra packages. > Chime > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >