From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v5F28sZ3011375 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 22:08:54 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 52DB98187F; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 02:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48F6F81878 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 02:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com (mail-it0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 196CC61B82 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 02:08:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 196CC61B82 Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=southernprince73@gmail.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 196CC61B82 Authentication-Results: mx1.redhat.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ME/0t7d1" Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m47so2850900iti.0 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:08:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent :mime-version; bh=qqNtWbqt+rJb/poy4og5+TmpF1LEeZOPl08SoEWtFFo=; b=ME/0t7d1BJmgsA23GiXxfGbqgblbMjlVHPs9cT3oMm5McX42JSFhU0acJYWkhvbSYy Ae1higy+Z13xifJdiAHLD+7hGRXsNzaexGjYNano2yyIWVhDJ20lhphLRyVXWJKRm9bY MO/cXtnySXqgyANwHj7C+sMOlTUzToiRR14qs78H2twUDuJ1f3+qSOMzWOBhWh2xYxmk lzDjaHtG8jdjuUGxH4nFpfDYsEg7Mi8ISouaTDf/X6VmYnSWUR7wpTP7vcKPzlAjc4KS 6X/y0i25GtGnqXBXSKYpghvIiSP3ZOu6ZZJCa/X4nuXoGcIsC7iqXafK/vTwr3/efLVg 7rQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=qqNtWbqt+rJb/poy4og5+TmpF1LEeZOPl08SoEWtFFo=; b=aG8fjh2brYkORTLdpGJtVqBfrK20SVSNWuTHsYEjiGERnI7Qid3XZRuAAX8M/s5p2X 7HdHWsCl3vmtBRinN+JMW5bswGgVFfiG04o+ed36L8Rvctmqq5CHowLI4gP2B4m5Z0az QYoKaFjokEcLvLxY2+3nfXMmucdEnz3yDHOy0oYXqwmySV/v9tFM2gyVxC0cMW0bHG0V QoYS6XAbNbx/X31+jCZGQxeU8wFFOYsUWqbIo9IO5b9ncZgYvE1PTLbyk1IxR55ZLWR1 R5H3di7aLxTROFeO8Chc/SHuChYAEQuoDp8sIMn13JItV/zrutXoSLzeebyXAzCCRgkL KLfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzrQIyYoalnzLVfwD9jBROtEzzrR0Y/u51Bm2CHbEZwdHnwiRo9 ef2HVK3ZeT0RnI5H X-Received: by 10.36.250.67 with SMTP id v64mr3179180ith.13.1497492530351; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:08:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (97-127-184-126.cdrr.qwest.net. [97.127.184.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e14sm860693itc.30.2017.06.14.19.08.49 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 19:08:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Mark Peveto Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 21:08:09 -0500 (CDT) X-X-Sender: markp@southernprince To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: re: working with nano In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 211 2017-05-04) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 02:08:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 02:08:51 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'209.85.214.44' DOMAIN:'mail-it0-f44.google.com' HELO:'mail-it0-f44.google.com' FROM:'southernprince73@gmail.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.52 (BAYES_50, DCC_REPUT_00_12, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_PASS) 209.85.214.44 mail-it0-f44.google.com 209.85.214.44 mail-it0-f44.google.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.39 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 02:08:54 -0000 Mark Peveto here. apt-get upgrade returned errors. Unexpected tokin and all that. Didn't work. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Everything happens after coffee! On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > If you're using debian: > apt-get upgrade > or aptitude --safe-upgrade > Fedora: > man dnf and use that to do the upgrades. > > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:27:05 > > From: Linux for blind general discussion > > To: Linux for blind general discussion > > Subject: re: working with nano > > > > Mark here, > > How do i get a newer one? > > > > > > Mark Peveto > > Registered Linux user number 600552 > > Everything happens after coffee! > > > > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > > > > > the nano Mark has is probably pretty old. Put a # in front of line 12 > > > that > > > says set linenumbers for now and you should get past that line. > > > line numbers do work in the current nano archlinux version. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Blinux-list mailing list > > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blinux-list mailing list > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >