From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v5FDuNhw006685 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:56:23 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id A6ECF17C31; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F7717C25 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.shellworld.net (server2.shellworld.net [66.172.12.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E16280C24 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:56:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4E16280C24 Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hubert-humphrey.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=chime@hubert-humphrey.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 4E16280C24 Received: by server2.shellworld.net (Postfix, from userid 1028) id E7A2B8C04A3; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAE38C0058 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 06:56:19 -0700 To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: re: working with nano In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Delayed for 23:10:57 by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:56:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:56:20 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'66.172.12.120' DOMAIN:'server2.shellworld.net' HELO:'server2.shellworld.net' FROM:'chime@hubert-humphrey.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.8 (BAYES_50) 66.172.12.120 server2.shellworld.net 66.172.12.120 server2.shellworld.net X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.26 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 13:56:23 -0000 Actually Mark, if you were to run aptitude and if it says it cannot find any packages, it may reference packages with nano in its description. You can then paste those in your next apt-get or aptitude. Otherwise, a more drastic step would be useing a question mark, as in aptitude install nano? You would probably need to completely become root, but you may also get alot of extra packages. Chime