From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])
	by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
	id o8KLPhUo028470 for <blinux-list@listman.util.phx.redhat.com>;
	Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:25:43 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
	[10.5.110.12])
	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP
	id o8KLPbtY020560
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:25:38 -0400
Received: from ewr.djernes.net (ewr.djernes.net [97.107.141.189])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8KLPQ1q005912
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:25:26 -0400
Received: from data.home (bzq-79-182-184-216.red.bezeqint.net
 [79.182.184.216])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by ewr.djernes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F16AF2EA1B
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:25:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 ewr.djernes.net F16AF2EA1B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=quitelikely.com;
	s=2010; t=1285017921;
	bh=rR9MBK/yg+NymXso/xbl/jGvDfPTHmicoxBXPY3s+UU=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:
	MIME-Version:Content-Type;
	b=QrGt2YTyYYYsBXTrG6XxnyC8PxHwRMb+6CJotNAeXN84HakiU2/G0HvBkolNak94p
	p2SpL43Au18zHg4krQbbB8gEb6E9aAvfs2fgLJOlT1nL99CouKCHsndWkMOVqot/bN
	FfY2UeyXy/Ebmsj6n8zBrmz8XDxKEyWp4rFlvdCE=
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:25:18 +0200 (IST)
From: Geoff Shang <geoff@QuiteLikely.com>
X-X-Sender: geoff@data.home
To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: News Group Issues within Pine?
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009200450120.90487@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1009202321490.4061@data.home>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.64.1009190925001.59037@server1.shellworld.net>
	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1009192347460.4061@data.home>
	<Pine.BSF.4.64.1009191450540.72950@server1.shellworld.net>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1009200450120.90487@freire1.furyyjbeyq.arg>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.1  (DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.110.12
X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com
X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com>
List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/blinux-list>,
	<mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/blinux-list>
List-Post: <mailto:blinux-list@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list>,
	<mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:25:43 -0000

On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Jude DaShiell wrote:

> The alpine program is the one to file bugs against since only those with 
> uwashington.edu accounts can file bugs against pine and get support.

Not sure when this was the case, but it's not the case any longer.  UW is 
not developing Pine in any form, ALPine or any other version.  They have 
decided to cease development of their own client.

I've also heard (without confirmation) that this decision and the 
resultant purchasing of commercial licenses for a replacement nearly sent 
them broke.

It is the consensus of the alpine-info mailing list that the 
re-alpine.SourceForge.net project is the only place that's showing any 
signs of life.

Geoff.