From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8K8vEcT008909 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:57:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.12]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8K8v9bI028712 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:57:09 -0400 Received: from server1.shellworld.net (shellworld.net [69.60.117.94]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8K8uvju010103 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:56:58 -0400 Received: by server1.shellworld.net (Postfix, from userid 1024) id 3F1FF22A48; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:56:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.shellworld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFB622814 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:56:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Jude DaShiell To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: Re: News Group Issues within Pine? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.01 (T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.16 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.110.12 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:57:14 -0000 shellworld.net has had alpine up and running for at least the last year. The alpine program is the one to file bugs against since only those with uwashington.edu accounts can file bugs against pine and get support. The working arrangement is that pine is experimental software and intended as such. Stuff that works in pine gets ported over to alpine and things that break in pine either get replaced or removed. When something is broken in both packages, then file the bug against alpine and it'll likely get attention whether you have a uwashington.edu account or not. This is the same strategy Okidata followed when manufacturing printers. They used Japan as a test bed to make their mistakes and correct those mistakes and sold the models with the corrections to the rest of the world. On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Hart Larry wrote: > Hi Jeff: Here on Shellworld, its 4.64, which was last version of pine, but > even on my hard-drive, its Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) built Wed Aug 27 > 14:30:56 EDT 2008 on x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com > Really unless the binary is within last 2days or so, I cannot grab much older > with that nntp range set. If I make that value 0 then I see everything or > at least since my last visit. > Hart > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >