From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
	[172.16.52.254])
	by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
	m2F8wjqX001997 for <blinux-list@listman.util.phx.redhat.com>;
	Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:58:45 -0400
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2F8wjoJ028605
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:58:45 -0400
Received: from relay1-v.mail.gandi.net (relay1-v.mail.gandi.net
	[217.70.178.75])
	by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2F8wCXc026557
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:58:12 -0400
Received: from localhost (mfilter1-v.gandi.net [217.70.178.35])
	by relay1-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66E3362AF
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:58:06 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter1-v.gandi.net
Received: from relay1-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.75])
	by localhost (mfilter1-v.gandi.net [217.70.178.35]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id Jr12Zf9a55yT for <blinux-list@redhat.com>;
	Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:58:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from data.home (unknown [82.166.29.82])
	by relay1-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D59D362AA
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:57:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from geoff by data.home with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1JaSD9-0002aB-00; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:57:51 +0200
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:57:51 +0200 (IST)
From: Geoff Shang <Geoff@quitelikely.com>
X-X-Sender: geoff@data.home
To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <47DB974D.8020504@baechler.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803151056200.27966@data.home>
References: <200803141710490437.0009BCBC@127.0.0.1>
	<47DB974D.8020504@baechler.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: Geoff Shang <geoff@data.home.redhat.com>
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -1.118 
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 172.16.48.32
X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading to Gnome 2.22
X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com>
List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list>,
	<mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/blinux-list>
List-Post: <mailto:blinux-list@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list>,
	<mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:58:46 -0000

Hi,

People I've spoken to who use Gnome regularly seem to recommend running 
Debian unstable so as to keep up with Gnome development.  Of course this is 
not for everyone, but I'm told that now with the existance of Debian 
Experimental, Unstable is more stable than it used to be.

Geoff.