From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.44.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764593F635 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:48:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [12.107.208.239]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g0TLmPW04626 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:48:25 -0500 Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g0TLmO801366 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:48:24 -0500 Received: from front1.chartermi.net (24.213.60.123.up.mi.chartermi.net [24.213.60.123]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) with ESMTP id g0TLmOC01362 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:48:24 -0500 Received: from [24.196.69.180] (HELO maranatha.chartermi.net) by front1.chartermi.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b2) with ESMTP id 53254190 for blinux-list@redhat.com; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 16:48:24 -0500 Received: from chomiak (helo=localhost) by maranatha.chartermi.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16Vg8i-0000BI-00 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:50:04 -0600 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:50:04 -0600 (CST) From: Cheryl Homiak To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Making Device Fiiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I am wondering about this problem from a different angle. I am wondering why John has to make a /dev/modem. I am using debian, if that makes a difference. I have no /dev/modem, and minicom has never complained about my not having one. What would cause minicom to need a /dev/modem? -- Cheryl