From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.44.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9D93EA23 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:10:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id fAJ5Aop03533 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:10:50 -0500 Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id fAJ5Ao108878 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:10:50 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home (modemcable084.137-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.137.84]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id fAJ5Amw08874; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:10:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (nico@localhost) by xanadu.home (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAJ5AnL13552; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:10:50 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: xanadu.home: nico owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:10:49 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Problems with Brltty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, L. C. Robinson wrote: > I think turning kudzu off is a bad idea, especially for > inexperienced users. You think so? I really feel like your suggestion about editing scripts or config files is more likely to frighten inexperienced users than a simple "chkconfig kudzu off". I personally never needed it after the initial Red Hat installation. Nicolas