From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B828B2F281 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 12:14:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f89GErU14143 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 12:14:53 -0400 Received: from ns.shellworld.net (IDENT:root@ns.shellworld.net [64.29.16.176]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f89GErg14139 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 12:14:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (jdashiel@localhost) by ns.shellworld.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA01586 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 12:14:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 12:14:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Jude DaShiell To: Subject: Re: red hat system almost talking: question related to comments In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Don't know what a pam unix session is, haven't experienced one of those yet. Another change I did to /etc/inittab was to remove line 57 since it appeared to be starting up x. I suppose I could replace that last line with something to start up bash. Only thing is that seems to be coming up already so I don't know. Jude