From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4FF2F2F7 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 22:55:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f882tnT02557 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 22:55:49 -0400 Received: from ns.shellworld.net (IDENT:root@ns.shellworld.net [64.29.16.176]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f882tng02553 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 22:55:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (jdashiel@localhost) by ns.shellworld.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA19644 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 22:55:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 22:55:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Jude DaShiell To: Subject: RE: The growing accessibility gap: was Ameritech.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: There are secured sites at work I have access to which because of problems I ran into with them and because sighted people checked them out with validators have been declared inaccessible. One of those two sites I figured a workaround for another one is so broken it's probably going to be scrapped. Neither was written by my employer but my employer bought both of them from private contractors. Now, as for that site I figured a workaround on one of the more competent computer users at my place of employment who is sighted had so much trouble with that site it took him 2 days to get his work done on it for the first time. For me it only took a week but I got it done. Jude