From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6732F9CD for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:35:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f881ZqG30184 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:35:52 -0400 Received: from ns.shellworld.net (IDENT:root@ns.shellworld.net [64.29.16.176]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f881Zpg30180 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:35:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (jdashiel@localhost) by ns.shellworld.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA17656 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:35:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:35:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Jude DaShiell To: Subject: Re: The growing accessibility gap: was Ameritech.net In-Reply-To: <20010907.181440.-16349745.0.blindguy13@juno.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: The command line interface does not cause me any problems, it's that other junk that makes life hell. So far as bitching is concerned, you haven't yet heard me bitch. All I did was to state some widely known and accepted axioms which are axiomatic since they're so easily proven. Were you correct in your statements, the Council Of Agencies Serving the blind would not have contemplated taking Microsoft to court in January of 1995. As it was, certain agreements were reached that seemingly alleviated the necessity for litigation. Jude