From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.44.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6DC3FCF8 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:25:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [12.107.208.239]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g0MCP6W21553 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:25:06 -0500 Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g0MCP6i02141 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:25:06 -0500 Received: from mail1.arcor-ip.de (mail1.arcor-ip.de [145.253.2.10]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) with ESMTP id g0MCP6C02135 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:25:06 -0500 Received: from goldfish (212.144.147.16) by mail1.arcor-ip.de (5.5.034) id 3C4192F70013BE89 for blinux-list@redhat.com; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:25:02 +0100 Received: (qmail 1879 invoked by uid 7780); 21 Jan 2002 21:30:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jan 2002 21:30:41 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 22:30:41 +0100 (CET) From: Hans Zoebelein X-Sender: hzo@goldfish To: Rafael Cc: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC: Will Redhat Become a Division of AOL Time-Warner? In-Reply-To: <20020121130450.C16902@ark.linwin.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Rafael wrote: > > That's what I thought. This mailing list is on one of their servers as far > as I can tell so it might get affected by the merger. Also, the discussion > comes up about other distributions which is "out of redhat domain". blinux-list might run on any server on the Web. Setting up a mailing list to another server isn't to too complicated today (search www.google.com for 'mailman'). Since Redhat is not involved with blinux-list/project other than their hosting of the list, there is no "redhat domain" involved by us. > > Perhaps there should be a complete domain dedicated to everything for > linux users with limited or no vision. Perhaps it would be a good idea to > have more than one mailing list to separate technical issues from whatever > else is of interest to the users. I checked blinux.org and found that it's > already in use so something else would be needed in case people wanted > independence from a certain corporate entity. blinux.org is owned by me (to give credit where credit is due: the people at leb.net were so kind to register blinux.org for me some time ago). Enjoy! --Hans