From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (qmail 4498 invoked from network); 11 Dec 1996 04:21:02 -0000 Received: from mailhost1.primenet.com (206.165.5.51) by mail2.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 1996 04:21:00 -0000 Received: from primenet.com (numbers@usr07.primenet.com [206.165.5.107]) by mailhost1.primenet.com (8.8.3/wjp-h3.00) with ESMTP id VAA28368 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 21:19:51 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (numbers@localhost) by primenet.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id VAA04936 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 21:19:51 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 22:19:50 -0600 (CST) From: Craig Martin To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: another idea for speech In-Reply-To: <199612100351.TAA16860@netcom21.netcom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: well, this is a very interesting train of thought. It would be nice if we could find a way to use a doubletalk board in a linux invironment, But what you might be able to do is tell emacs speaks the way to control a double talk external or a lite talk and then use the standard console keys as the input. This might take some of the pressure off of those who have less resources. I have two double talk internal boards here at home, and I wonder if they could run with emacs speaks? I'm annew user of Linux, so this is a new idea to me. What do you all think? craig martin numbers@primenet.com packet: wa0wpj@wa0wpj.ampr.org