From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t0SNSmM0021181 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:28:48 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx11.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.16]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0SNSm66025344 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:28:48 -0500 Received: from server1.shellworld.net (shellworld.net [69.60.117.94]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0SNSkkf029956 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:28:46 -0500 Received: by server1.shellworld.net (Postfix, from userid 1005) id C271B22968; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:28:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.shellworld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05242294B for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:28:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:28:45 -0500 (EST) From: Karen Lewellen To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: Re: results of my try. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -1.91 (BAYES_00, SPF_PASS, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, URIBL_BLOCKED) 69.60.117.94 shellworld.net 69.60.117.94 shellworld.net X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.110.16 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:28:48 -0000 To paraphrase Tim, those suggestions require eyeballs. If you read the information, it should be clear I had to get someone else to do that, and it took some arranging. On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Cheryl Homiak wrote: > Actually, the suggestions don't require any more experimentation than what you did. But the command you did as a regular user really does have to be done as root. Also the only difference between ifconfig eth0 and ifconfig is that the ifconfig without the argument allows debian to show you which interfaces if any are working. It is quite possible that your setup is working but under a different interface than eth0. > > -- > Cheryl > > "Move forward by looking back! > "Above all, fear the Lord > and worship Him faithfully with all your heart; > consider the great things He has done for you." > (1 Samuel 12:24 (HCSB) > > > > > > On Jan 28, 2015, at 10:34 AM, Karen Lewellen wrote: > > I believe I have made it very clear how much experimentation is possible in prior discussions. > I followed Tim's directions, there are the results. > Karen > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Willem van der Walt wrote: > >> Hi, >> As root, do: >> ifconfig and check which interfaces show up. Your ethernet might be picked up as another interface, e.g. eth1. >> You should simply first test by pinging your router. >> HTH, Willem >> >> >> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> here is what happened when seeking the ip address. >>> Let me explain how I set up the machine. >>> before even booting I put the dsl cable I am using now to send >>> this message into the linux box, keeping it connected to my >>> modem/rooter as usual. >>> Because we were pressed for time, after letting speakup start, >>> and entering my username, Karen, and my password, I simply used >>> the print screen key to silence speakup. >>> the error message we got is below. >>> I saw karen@suburst:~s and there was no other place to type so >>> after karen@sunburst:~s I typed /sbin/ifconfig eth0 as instructed >>> the message we got was: eth0: error fetching interface >>> information: Device not Found >>> >>> We tried the step more than once to be sure. >>> let me add that typing shutdown -h also produced an error, so I >>> simply turned off the machine after restoring speakup. >>> The Ethernet card was in the computer before the hard drive >>> containing Debian was installed, so was the rest of the hardware >>> Linux identified. >>> thoughts? >>> Karen >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Blinux-list mailing list >>> Blinux-list@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >>> >>> -- >>> This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, >>> e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. >>> The full disclaimer details can be found at >>> http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html. >>> >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by >>> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >>> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this email. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Blinux-list mailing list >> Blinux-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >