From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5B13F909 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:15:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7AHFqk13287 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:15:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7AHFqq13283 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:15:52 -0400 Received: from server1.shellworld.net (root@server1.shellworld.net [64.39.15.178]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7AH2Tl14805 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:02:29 -0400 Received: from localhost (jdashiel@localhost) by server1.shellworld.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g7AHFo840123 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:15:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jdashiel@shellworld.net) Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 13:15:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Jude DaShiell To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Imaging the hard drive? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Why not make everybody happy and pipe the dd output into tar with the Z option so compressed tar files come out? Is /proc all that needn't be backed up or do other directory trees exist too? I could make a little script out of this perhaps and share it with the list. The thing is, it's possible to make those compressed tar files land on zip disks which is how I'd do it for myself but the thing I'd like to figure out is if tar could be told to put a unique disk number into each file it wrote on those zip disks. That way ordering of disks for restore would be easy for blind or sighted people. On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Janina Sajka wrote: > You're correct, Mike. dd will write an exact byte by byte image. He was > asking about Ghost, and I think this would be the analog to Ghost. tar is > also an excellent choice, however. > On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Mike Gorse wrote: > > > Janina, I am not sure that that would work well for what he wants to do. > > I would not trust dd to make an image of a file system for the purpose of > > transporting it to another computer which may have a different hard disk > > and a Linux partition of a different size. Tar should work well, however, > > so long as you pass it parameters to exclude anything that you do not want > > copied (ie, /proc). > > > > -- Michael Gorse / AIM:linvortex / http://mgorse.home.dhs.org -- > > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Janina Sajka wrote: > > > > > Imaging in linux is the easiest imaging you will ever do. > > > > > > Use the dd command partition by partition as follows: > > > > > k > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blinux-list mailing list > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > > -- > > Janina Sajka, Director > Technology Research and Development > Governmental Relations Group > American Foundation for the Blind (AFB) > > Email: janina@afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175 > > Chair, Accessibility SIG > Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF) > http://www.openebook.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >