From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v5FEC27o009626 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:12:02 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id E2ADC17C31; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD9DF17C25 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg0-f44.google.com (mail-pg0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F0DB3345B0 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:11:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 7F0DB3345B0 Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mewtamer@gmail.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 7F0DB3345B0 Authentication-Results: mx1.redhat.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dc/NhXBt" Received: by mail-pg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a70so7216200pge.3 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 07:11:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KWqnLqyt64OWGWMiqZRJRqBrrL49bmXmpd3oSN6HmF8=; b=dc/NhXBtIhKFX5ABT9sxhrhIHdlv9e9Km4aEbqRX0ssCHzpTgGqO4ulGrzkHd2V9Bp wgqnHjCLYFkMM/wLDtIYgP4x/mekd+/jYC+rtOOjwYSHP78mzxI7AScqifheQta4yAxK ztY2Xc0qH42PHXnqnZsQQnpJqn5KRPSmhR76K0czk1d6nPg2vdiIif8nRlay3cau6gB7 Q1pFdS5Oxa5NL0+Mm4j36QK70vm/pp0Ygp/8C+sSB7w7+SN3MKa4X/rwlN56Y/1/A1C4 TyG+CqD5t/DbkJCL0zoRGuC8rKHu7katU7s/kd1/DBXjySlFicb+KfFAGiOT+6HixzQj +rHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KWqnLqyt64OWGWMiqZRJRqBrrL49bmXmpd3oSN6HmF8=; b=Gmm0BvUK+CyWB71ZHbpPyvDfT41fcfAzxl7YBD9rf0zXgdzaDTZ9XN1hJkYbkWo5rU 1QV3Zvif3P/B/J9N8AzI+uTrmMCVoAVGOxcnTnzSuRlZVuSeRlES+l1tobh1Mj45977/ bz1eNrS51Ue4H8TUoGqdP2qo99PVe8EhP4QaSl3BIftSqdvdacwWY1+kSqNvFeZ95xsJ VRrZ8qkvy5blEsrzZphS2xVj5zFVE4kBx34+OmmOeso9Rps3kuhL0UCDw3qXXWrBjVT1 oXno7ofMXPPqio3VL55xpCqxQUK8QTqHZdWP4XHxhUZKl4mHyXx5aQY5q+tAqev8VYvi uPyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzn21UV3HdfmgSfBqKTeKDzj+8A5+Q9CEhwF2b/XOn2p00JroGf inhJ9ggFg6VZaM+W375brNofOm56hA== X-Received: by 10.84.232.72 with SMTP id f8mr72937pln.87.1497535918905; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 07:11:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.150.150 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 07:11:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:11:58 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: working with nano To: blinux-list@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:11:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:11:59 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'74.125.83.44' DOMAIN:'mail-pg0-f44.google.com' HELO:'mail-pg0-f44.google.com' FROM:'mewtamer@gmail.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.71 (BAYES_50, DCC_REPUT_00_12, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_PASS) 74.125.83.44 mail-pg0-f44.google.com 74.125.83.44 mail-pg0-f44.google.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.29 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:12:03 -0000 I don't know which version of Debian you're running, but I just did some quick checks, and: Debian oldstable(Wheezy?) and Debian Stable(still Jessie for now though I believe Stretch is in Release Candidate) both offer a 2.2.6 version of nano. Debian Testing, which is what I'm running, has a 2.7 version of Nano. I don't really follow Nano development, so I have no idea whey the version number changed so little during the previous Debian release cycle compared to the current one or what changed between 2.2 and 2.7. -- Sincerely, Jeffery Wright President Emeritus, Nu Nu Chapter, Phi Theta Kappa. Former Secretary, Student Government Association, College of the Albemarle.