From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wBIJAFDb024731 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 14:10:15 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 7D58D67CF0; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7389967CEF for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi1-f176.google.com (mail-oi1-f176.google.com [209.85.167.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C6C2369B7 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f176.google.com with SMTP id w13so2848456oiw.9 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:10:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=95U0aaQyPrcAVjDkPOGogMJxTvdfiUt+6wjbrbpaTqo=; b=EpAUn2K1I1mSYenGxUQDE+CEkxVYzcNJysWIK4XvX1eWrNwjWXow6yhyLdCRQbPcl5 DPqjiNCdUO4TncD5mkSTxyRVf0+IlapN4R4uVr7FfQ2O0aSrxJZ8xGiLBZiyKPZ+Ndt9 IO20krCJwUMTvc/sDSY79/NFe2NFbCFojIxILDuCq2kpHx6qDP2Nra/8AQIzgkOC7Cwr xLuo1vSu3fheKe/7i/NJ2ydCRLDFXM5mZXxVCtuVQheaeeHwFfT3HnmnbIdlgxqQTBz+ +6rytxgdAMlJ1hHTLt/8GsDziJMJ91iM7jgPZymGJxXQ30HGd99f2p0XBFKFiUQ3Xbpw ucIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=95U0aaQyPrcAVjDkPOGogMJxTvdfiUt+6wjbrbpaTqo=; b=V3xMUsr/6DqVFFSA6QCXIOLa5U8W13hDMVvP3jLrBSXCjdv/GavfCsv51RHi+LxKvj aaxDIAW4ZgG+AU2HZZStB8vzT8g8E9LzgpygJWkMbY7C/lBnc9kDWOP4DLENOOjyrIs1 /nl2MG4Fx4G9k9ZxYVD47HgSzlWStHMvKPwzoEtRSAB0KllvavEapq7eECT8R84ptNM4 4ZVoJZ+ACJn0LNM4Q0/b8pQ5IL2tf8cVejdTPdbutZfbDOX8R3BpsqWDiNHII/vJPyIU Zx1pwUKkMZwb4akorvYAQMEtEkiBu1PmDNXcxt87hkdvXdfGDltRK1Ir4dkRVOsK1fS6 u90g== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYwIahcwCfgHcUp9tDsJFLPTQkXkPo4b1wxVYpcN6T6B7oAKzOF 6ejWwfYVmj3ZkI3YgmUo5oPiuLUqFc4rpI+mSlakjQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VCHhspnHADFlWiaL0yGJO8QhKgDLokMeO7uGRq4AI7UL5hWvI1f/F1k52eC2dzkwha7KF5BZJvnTxlAdZJoas= X-Received: by 2002:aca:3cc5:: with SMTP id j188mr8772950oia.278.1545160210355; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:10:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2158:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:10:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20181218184819.GA8150@rednote.net> References: <20181218184819.GA8150@rednote.net> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:10:09 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: extracting text from png files To: blinux-list@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:10:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:10:11 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'209.85.167.176' DOMAIN:'mail-oi1-f176.google.com' HELO:'mail-oi1-f176.google.com' FROM:'mewtamer@gmail.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.111 (DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_PASS) 209.85.167.176 mail-oi1-f176.google.com 209.85.167.176 mail-oi1-f176.google.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.30 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 19:10:15 -0000 And this is one of the reasons I hate acronyms, so easy to mix up words with related meanings and the same first letter. Probably doesn't help that, I think it's KDE's gui application for OCR that's called Okular or something similar, and switch optical to ocular in a Google search reduces the number of hits from 26 million to only 9 million, so both wordings have fairly widespread usage. -- Sincerely, Jeffery Wright Bachelor of Computer Science President Emeritus, Nu Nu Chapter, Phi Theta Kappa.