From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wBECo1A9027040 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:50:01 -0500 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 615DF1054FDD; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx19.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0771054FD4 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com [209.85.128.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BDD8307D96E for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id a62so5573590wmh.4 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 04:49:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GLxZtslcMgOqHrY7KIlqDI9tGXmpeDYDfg08WAJ/sNc=; b=fDlZRmiJmZ3Q8Hjv5/NXYqDZWNmEV3WT5XJhs9iqO/90f000LXpe5Qtvk2TQFWUA/Q S9PPRdLTsp32FGSBCK5KH63gki9CX2rhW0fbPFQg4pj9u+tRskBKFALbgiAGcMzsZ68z zdt5BG/oyoFmTQ8uavKyM6ja+aHHK1uYgCFvFu2FB+qVz+PwGZMdPRSuDNuhaqG20in0 4w0Ji/iCSU/x8rB1eyT6YPbTX/juAeIsIwRpimVmkb00n1w6U4RjujeUB31LKX427JUc 34CFSYsj6OJ+q3f/Mg25wW4u8O2c5E2JLOV82OTRAh5jI3WiMlE3Bo5vtdd41oroMc6B r+zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=GLxZtslcMgOqHrY7KIlqDI9tGXmpeDYDfg08WAJ/sNc=; b=SgvWNsrzr5xBKbLTN4fSZBp+q4m9F50QhxalaFcY6WSb3zHGrV3bQRIKwz5J+q86NI qrEBVYvmi09+58PRgfrXB6djL2f1o1YmIoYrnTEoIKQ4Hd5vMDrvsP1lnTZ0cc+L7N5Z 8EEPMmhhkv46DF156YKGydevGI42O0UkEDuuXM4kFKrAR2nOG3j4SPymPQPgmxb0moIr I6TLqsOelTwh+v3YxnQsaKj/AWYBDRLK6mwp9sOwrh6XIKCMF1MLwunFVbgWYYKtEioD 3ZA6BtUy+qgXRcTQSqgAe1N+jY/Xeb0SkhfNOvNg/8QjtprhwqbQduEJ1RpYG5uaCSDT rBig== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWabGERf5Aw2l/3Rvobqj6AXE5/ya/nIAYltkfOBImSi7Aq3iTMq KLJdH1vH7DWs8n87nX+IkM3/wBJaYUpQYsa/w0Tfpg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WbX4dpjJIA+62b5lp+P2XVul3jb5YrNRqqESgUIHBUvlI2W6cpAcXuuiC3f0k8mpXPxU+t0DYbyZuAuqQJ8Yg= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b607:: with SMTP id g7mr3226442wmf.97.1544791796370; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 04:49:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a5d:5189:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 04:49:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:49:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: minix 3 To: blinux-list@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:49:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:49:58 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'209.85.128.50' DOMAIN:'mail-wm1-f50.google.com' HELO:'mail-wm1-f50.google.com' FROM:'hurstseth405@gmail.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.139 (DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_PASS) 209.85.128.50 mail-wm1-f50.google.com 209.85.128.50 mail-wm1-f50.google.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.110.48 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:50:01 -0000 I read about it and looks interesting. Its supposed to be compatible with the stuff from netbsd but I don't know how it differs from the linux kurnel. On 12/14/18, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > No clue on accessibility, but yes I have heard of minix in one of its > earlier incarnations. For a while I worked in a Naval Research facility > and the management in the department in which I work decided to install > minix base-wide. The result was disasterous and nearly got our > department shut down. > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:11:50 >> From: Linux for blind general discussion >> To: blinux-list@redhat.com >> Subject: minix 3 >> >> Has anyone here ever used or installed minix 3 and how accessible is it? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Blinux-list mailing list >> Blinux-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >> > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >