From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
	[172.16.52.254])
	by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
	m2F9FNck003964 for <blinux-list@listman.util.phx.redhat.com>;
	Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:15:23 -0400
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2F9FNbo001573
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:15:23 -0400
Received: from dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com (dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com
	[68.99.120.48])
	by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2F9EpMB001554
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:14:51 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (really [70.166.17.50])
	by dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com
	(InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP
	id <20080315091443.PZLN28132.dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com@[192.168.0.100]>
	for <blinux-list@redhat.com>; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:14:43 -0400
Message-ID: <47DBA195.907@baechler.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:14:45 -0800
From: Tony Baechler <tony@baechler.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com>
References: <200803141710490437.0009BCBC@127.0.0.1>
	<47DB974D.8020504@baechler.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0803151056200.27966@data.home>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803151056200.27966@data.home>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.025 
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 172.16.48.32
X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading to Gnome 2.22
X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com>
List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list>,
	<mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/blinux-list>
List-Post: <mailto:blinux-list@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list>,
	<mailto:blinux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:15:23 -0000

Hi,

All I know is that I'm pulling in both Debian unstable and Ubuntu Hardy 
and apt-cache madison gnome-orca shows that Ubuntu is newer.  Then 
again, I'm not one to say much because I never got my instllation of 
Gnome to work. <grin>  I was surprised that apparently Ubuntu was 
newer.  Yes, I do update my package lists fairly often.  I don't know if 
anything else is newer but it looked like Orca had a higher version number.

Geoff Shang wrote:
> People I've spoken to who use Gnome regularly seem to recommend 
> running Debian unstable so as to keep up with Gnome development.  Of 
> course this is not for everyone, but I'm told that now with the 
> existance of Debian Experimental, Unstable is more stable than it used 
> to be.