From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BC42F607 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:27:37 -0500 (EST) Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id eB4MRb707561 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:27:37 -0500 Received: from gate.ufw2.com ([216.163.19.158]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id eB4MRaD07557 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:27:36 -0500 Received: from [216.163.21.20] by gate.ufw2.com for blinux-list@redhat.com id QAA21400; Mon Dec 4 16:27:35 2000 Received: from hardb ([216.163.21.57]) by mail.ufw2.com (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA00011 for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:28:37 -0600 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20001204163017.007acd20@mail.ufw2.com> X-Sender: bharding@mail.ufw2.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:30:17 -0600 Subject: Re: free at last no longer free In-Reply-To: References: <200012011359.IAA17005@cougar.aero-vision.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Brent Harding X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta4 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion I know netzero will work if you use your password in encrypted form, how odd. I guess at their password prompt you would type your encrypted password, username would be user@netzero.net, the whole thing, whether it gets even more difficult I'm unsure, found it by accident once. At 03:04 PM 12/4/00 +0100, you wrote: >On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, A. R. Vener wrote: > > > > > > > Apparently there are charging now. > > > > Personally I think they should change their domain to > > 'freeat first.com' but that's another matter. > > > > > > Has anyone managed to get Juno.com, Bluelight.com or any other free ISP > > provider to work with their Linux ppp daemon? If so could you post the > > details here? >have a good look in the following logsifles: /var/log/messages >/var/log/kernel.log /var/log/syslog and maybe /var/log/debug >these files contain info about the sessions you made and what went wrong as >well. >It could probably be that they are using the chap-autentication instead of >the pap-autenticaion protocol which normal isp's often do. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Rudy > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blinux-list mailing list > > Blinux-list@redhat.com > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > > >slainte leat freisin (cheers to you also), >----------- >Andor Demarteau E-mail: ademarte@students.cs.uu.nl >student computer science www: http://www.students.cs.uu.nl/~ademarte/ >Utrecht University note: homepage is outdated, don't remind me! >----------- >Believe in yourself, know what you want, and make it happen! > > > >_______________________________________________ >Blinux-list mailing list >Blinux-list@redhat.com >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > > >