public inbox for blinux-list@redhat.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brent Harding <bharding@mail.ufw2.com>
To: blinux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: talking terminals
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 22:19:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20000822221948.007e1b10@mail.ufw2.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000822222554.A523@lpwh.pwh.com>

When the floppy noise completes, just like normal, just using the phone
lines instead of serial ports. Can networking work the same thing, like
text eth0?
At 10:25 PM 8/22/00 -0400, you wrote:
>It should work over a modem.
>I just plugged the serial terminal into com1, fired it up and loaded commo
and jaws for dos.
>I put the floppy into the drive, and puthe cdrom into its drive,
>and booted the computer. at the boot prompt,
>which i detected by listening for floppy drive noise, i typed the command
>i mentioned below.
>The only thing I could see wrong with a modem installation, is knowing when
>to type the command.
>phil
>On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:08:21PM -0500, Brent Harding wrote:
>> Would it do the same over modem? Did you put the CD in the machine to
>> install on, or do you have to upload it off the machine you use as a
>> terminal? What if I do it, substituting the port my modem uses? At 09:11 PM
>> 8/22/00 -0400, you wrote:
>> >I must say you are completely incorrect. I have installed linux
>> >using a serial terminal dozens of times since 1994 when I started
>> >with linux.
>> >I have installed both slackware and redhat using a serial
>> >terminal, the most recent last
>> >friday afternoon when I installed
>> >redhat 6.2 on my computer at work without any sighted help whatsoever.
>> >just for anyone who wishes to know how,
>> >at the boot prompt after booting the installation floppy from redhat,
>> >type the following command to install using a 
>> >serial terminal, or more acurately a serial console:
>> >text console=ttyS0,9600n8
>> >or in my case since i was impatient,
>> >text console=ttyS0,115200n8
>> >
>> >it worked without a problem.
>> >
>> >phil
>> >
>> >On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 07:56:03AM -0700, cbrannon1979@earthlink.net
wrote:
>> >> I was reading all the discussion about talking terminals yesterday.  The
>> >> way I see it, they have a very big disadvantage to a screenreader for a
>> >> blind person with a hardware synthesizer.  You need sighted help to
install
>> >> Linux with a talking terminal.  And IMNSHO, a sighted person reading a
>> screen
>> >> for me is a very poor substitute for speech output, especially if you're
>> >> like me, and don't
>> >> know anyone in your area who uses Linux.  I installed Zipspeak with
>> absolutely
>> >> zero sighted assistance.  And as far as I can tell, kernels built with
>> >> Speakup can do this for full distributions, as well.  This would make
>> >> Linux the only operating system that can be installed by someone who is
>> blind
>> >> without sighted help.  Maybe I could install DOS on my own, if I'd
done it
>> >> enough, but I wouldn't have the computer actually talking to me while
I was
>> >> installing.  And, with Speakup you get speech from bootup to power
>> >> down.  Only thing that
>> >> won't talk to you now is the BIOS, and there's supposedly a board you
>> can get
>> >> that'll send the BIOS messages out the serial port.    Compare this
>> setup to
>> >> Win-95, where speech isn't necessarily constant, even if you're booted
>> and the 
>> >> screenreader's active.  (JFW crashes so easy its sick.)
>> >> But getting back to the topic of talking terminals. Anyone remember the
>> >> old Apple II computer from the seventies?  That's what I started out
>> >> on; and I seem to remember that the synthesizer for those was only about
>> >> $150, or so.  Question is, if a blind person doesn't have a hardware
>> >> synth, would it be possible to use an Apple II as a terminal under
>> >> Linux?  You can still find them, once in a while, and like I said, the
>> >> synth was cheap, even new.  I seem to remember them having a serial
port,
>> >> so I'd think they could be usable as talking terminals, for someone with
>> >> limited funds who doesn't have, and can't afford a hardware synthesizer.
>> >> Later.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Blinux-list mailing list
>> >> Blinux-list@redhat.com
>> >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Blinux-list mailing list
>> >Blinux-list@redhat.com
>> >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blinux-list mailing list
>> Blinux-list@redhat.com
>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Blinux-list mailing list
>Blinux-list@redhat.com
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
>
>




  reply	other threads:[~ UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
 cbrannon1979
 ` philwh
   ` Brent Harding
     ` philwh
       ` Brent Harding [this message]
         ` philwh
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008220754340.513-100000@gondor.notarealdoma in.org>
 ` Brent Harding
 ` Count Zero
   ` tyler
   ` Brent Harding
     ` A. R. Vener
       ` Brent Harding
     ` Count Zero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3.0.6.32.20000822221948.007e1b10@mail.ufw2.com \
    --to=bharding@mail.ufw2.com \
    --cc=blinux-list@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).