From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) by lists01.pubmisc.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v5EKUq5q002128 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:30:56 -0400 Received: by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) id 2C13918BAC; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F9D17AD4 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABF1A80F7B for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com ABF1A80F7B Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=thechases.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=tempfail smtp.mailfrom=blinux.list@thechases.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com ABF1A80F7B X-Sender-Id: wwwh2|x-authuser|tim@thechases.com Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD431280EB for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from uscentral455.accountservergroup.com (unknown [100.96.126.254]) (Authenticated sender: wwwh2) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 54089128928 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: wwwh2|x-authuser|tim@thechases.com Received: from uscentral455.accountservergroup.com (uscentral455.accountservergroup.com [172.20.120.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.9.4); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:42 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: wwwh2|x-authuser|tim@thechases.com X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: wwwh2 X-Celery-Rock: 29ebec73548d5635_1497472242523_2715528715 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1497472242523:3326933723 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1497472242523 Received: from 172-0-250-193.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net ([172.0.250.193]:54639 helo=bigbox.christie.dr) by uscentral455.accountservergroup.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1dLEw5-001kMA-BJ for blinux-list@redhat.com; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:30:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:30:40 -0500 To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: working with nano Message-ID: <20170614153040.5862319b@bigbox.christie.dr> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AuthUser: tim@thechases.com X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, Sender IP whitelisted by DNSRBL, ACL 203 matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:48 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'23.83.209.55' DOMAIN:'eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net' HELO:'eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net' FROM:'blinux.list@thechases.com' RCPT:'' X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -0.21 (BAYES_50, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2) 23.83.209.55 eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net 23.83.209.55 eastern.birch.relay.mailchannels.net X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.27 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-loop: blinux-list@redhat.com From: Linux for blind general discussion X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:30:56 -0000 Tim here. Depending on the behavior you want, use one of the following in your ~/.nanorc file. If you want soft-wrapping where long lines display as wrapped but the lines remain as individually long lines in the saved file, add set softwrap If you want hard-wrapping where it will automatically insert line-breaks when you exceed the maximum line-length, you can unset nowrap (I find that double-negative is a bit weird). If it's doing that and you *don't* want it to wrap, you can add set nowrap to your file. Additionally, you can also specify where you want it to wrap, either at a particular offset such as 75 characters per line: set fill 75 or at an offset from your right-margin based on your screen-size, such as set fill -5 (the two commands should produce the same results on a standard 80-column terminal) You should be able to read more about each of these options in man nanorc Hope this helps, -tim (for whom this is all a bit foreign since I'm a vi/vim/ed sorta guy and only keep nano around for testing things just like this) On June 14, 2017, Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > Hi folks, Mark peveto here. > Normally, seems I'd set this in my nanorc, but I can't find it. > What i'm trying to do is make sure long line wrapping is on by > default, so I don't hafta remember to hit alt l every time I start > nano. There's a way to do it, but I dunno wha tit is. Can anyone > help me out? > > > Mark Peveto > Registered Linux user number 600552 > Everything happens after coffee! > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list