From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AF23EA18 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:41:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9D2fnh21242 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:41:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g9D2fnf21238 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:41:49 -0400 Received: from priv-edtnes27.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g9D2LYX22637 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:21:34 -0400 Received: from a1p8m1 ([207.6.49.182]) by priv-edtnes27.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20021013024142.PHSY23429.priv-edtnes27.telusplanet.net@a1p8m1> for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 20:41:42 -0600 Message-ID: <200210121941380540.00284E37@smtp.telus.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (3) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:41:38 -0700 From: "David Csercsics" To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: security programs Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com id g9D2fnf21238 X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: TCP Wrappers is in slackware by default. It says so in the slack book and tells you how to configure it and stuff. So it is there. On 12/10/2002 Jude DaShiell ran to their keyboard and tapped out this message: >By that standard, slackware 8.0.0 seems to fail. Unless tcp_wrappers is >hidden and protecting itself from update. > > > >On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, L. C. Robinson wrote: > >> Tcp_wrappers is a standard binary part of Red Hat, and >> any other decent distribution. It is essential to >> configure it after a new installation, for any decent >> security, of course, along with the other security >> configuration basics, such as installing all security >> updates. If one neglects those things, good security >> tools in linux are worthless, and you WILL get hacked >> (but maybe not quite so quickly as with a certain >> dominant vendor's junk software). >> >> LCR >> >> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Jude DaShiell wrote: >> >> > Has anyone managed to get tcp_wrappers_7.6 built and >> > operating under any version oor any brand of linux >> > yet? If you don't know what that i >> > ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/pub/security/index.html >> > should give you background info. >> >> -- >> L. C. Robinson >> reply to no_spam+munged_lcr@onewest.net.invalid >> >> People buy MicroShaft for compatibility, but get incompatibility and >> instability instead. This is award winning "innovation". Find >> out how MS holds your data hostage with "The *Lens*"; see >> "CyberSnare" at http://www.netaction.org/msoft/cybersnare.html >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Blinux-list mailing list >> Blinux-list@redhat.com >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >> > > > >_______________________________________________ >Blinux-list mailing list >Blinux-list@redhat.com >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list