From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost.localdomain (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCC83F34A for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:09:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (IDENT:root@lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2BG92526886 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:09:02 -0500 Received: (from mail@localhost) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) id g2BG92503066 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:09:02 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g2BG92R03060 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:09:02 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g2BG92526880 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:09:02 -0500 Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g2BG7ac03235 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:07:37 -0500 Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2BG8pG21465 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:08:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200203111608.g2BG8pG21465@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: netrik was ( lynx-dev latest status on java script support? ) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 10:08:51 -0600 From: Martin McCormick X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: You are absolutely correct on the cause for the curses problems. Earlier today, one of the people working on the development of this project wrote me and suggested the same thing. I do have the TERM environmental variable set, but it is set to vt100 because I use MSKermit which emulates a vt320 terminal. vt320 is a superset of the vt100's and vt102's. You usually can't go too wrong if you choose that setting. He suggested I try ansi as one of the terminal types and so far, so good. I tried netrik on one of our javascript-run sites produced by Lotus Notes, actually Lotus Domino which is what they call their web authoring device and I think I see the dawning of a new day. This is definitely an effort which may turn out to be something big. The authors say in several places that this is new code and I noticed that one of the files I downloaded on Friday had a date of the day before. These folks who have started this project have gotten off on the right foot as far as I can tell and we should all be patient and, if you can, roll up your sleeves and help grow it in to a good mature application. The code is neat and modular from what little I have looked at it and the documentation explains how it works. Martin Tim Pennick writes: >Martin, > >This is a long-shot, but have you checked that your TERM environment variable >is set. Bad error checking might lead curses to fall over if it can't decide >what type of terminal its dealing with. > >Regards, > >Tim Pennick > > > >_______________________________________________ >Blinux-list mailing list >Blinux-list@redhat.com >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >