From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost.localdomain (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0833EAAC for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:48:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (IDENT:root@lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g29BmI517406 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:48:18 -0500 Received: (from mail@localhost) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) id g29BmI012366 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:48:18 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g29BmIR12362 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:48:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g29BmI517402 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:48:18 -0500 Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g29Bl4b12650 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 06:47:05 -0500 Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g29BmEG30990 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2002 05:48:15 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200203091148.g29BmEG30990@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: netrik was ( lynx-dev latest status on java script support? ) Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 05:48:14 -0600 From: Martin McCormick X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I wrote: > Now I have had some time to try it out and so far, >nothing yet. On the Linux system, I get an immediate error >message that says that it can't initialize curses. I didn't know >you had to initialize curses. There is a man page on curses on the FreeBSD systems I use at work and you do have to initialize the curses routines with variables when you use them. This means that there is some kind of problem in the way netrik is calling the routines. I sent a message to one of the developers and have not received a response yet, but I bet I do get one eventually. This is quite normal for new software. Most of the stuff I write at work only has to transplant between 2 or 3 different systems and there is still more than enough trouble in getting it working everywhere it is supposed to work to keep ones head buzzing. I am confident that the problems I am having right now are temporary. No telling how well this software will work on our problem sites when the kinks get worked out of simply running it, but this is the best effort to come along in a long time. It obviously worked for the people who wrote it on their linux systems so the trick here is to figure out what is different about their systems and the one I am using (actually two different boxes but running the same software). Later on, I imagine that netrik will have more automation built in to the make process to better configure everything at the start. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if my systems are lacking some environmental variable setting or something like that. Stay tuned for more exciting adventures on the cutting edge. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK OSU Center for Computing and Information Services Network Operations Group