From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.44.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626E63ED4A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:02:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [12.107.208.239]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g0KL2pW27004 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:02:51 -0500 Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) id g0KL2p214789 for blinux-list@listman.redhat.com; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:02:51 -0500 Received: from ark.linwin.com (ark.linwin.com [198.144.195.43]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.8.7) with ESMTP id g0KL2oC14785 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 16:02:50 -0500 Received: from raffi by ark.linwin.com with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 16SP75-0003uu-00 for blinux-list@redhat.com; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:02:51 -0800 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:02:51 -0800 From: Rafael To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Will Redhat Become a Division of AOL Time-Warner? (fwd) Message-ID: <20020120130251.A15015@ark.linwin.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from director@chpi.org on Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 09:55:39AM -0600 X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 09:55:39AM -0600, John J. Boyer wrote: > Hello, > I'm a bit concerned that AOL Time Warner is thinking of buying Redhat. > Mergers and acquisitions usually turn out badly for customers and users. > The latest example is something very close to many of us - the merger of > Henter-Joyce and Blazie Engineering to form Freedom Scientific. Many > people, including myself, have had bad experiences with this company. But > at least Linux is in the public domain, so if AOL Time Warner ruins > redhat, we'll have other companies to turn to or can simply distribute it > ourselves. > John > I wouldn't worry about that possible merger. Others will pick up from where Redhat might drop it. On the other hand, Linux will get better positioned in the corporate world which is what many of us want anyway. As you said, Linux is open source so nobody can hijack or monopolize it like it happened so many times with other technologies. My expectation is that other less known distributions will come forward and gain some popularity if people turn away from AOL. That's good, we need better distributions than Redhat anyway. It's funny that Linux is the strongest in the server arena but the distributions like Redhat don't have it well designed in their configuration scripts. To redhat a server is a server, no difference between printer or NFS server for example. By the way, don't tell me that Debian is beter because it's not. It has better packaging tool but it's environment is not that well thought out. You have to manualy setup too many things in order to get the desired server configuration. Interesting start in new millenium. -- Rafael