* has OpenBSD got access team working
@ Ian Blackburn
` Gil Andre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Blackburn @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'blinux-list@redhat.com'
If you want a (Unix-like) operating system that was designed
with security in mind, you should use OpenBSD (which can be
found at: http://www.openbsd.org).
may be we can get too carried away everything to do with computer
programming rellies upon human work so is likely to have some whole in it
somewhere
========================================================
Standard disclaimer:
Any recipient of this communication acknowledges that:
* the Government Employees Superannuation Board accepts no responsibility
for the contents, nor the validity of this communication; and
* they do not rely on any view given unless it is properly authorised.
========================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: has OpenBSD got access team working
has OpenBSD got access team working Ian Blackburn
@ ` Gil Andre
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gil Andre @ UTC (permalink / raw)
To: blinux-list
Hi!
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 08:44:47 +0800
Ian Blackburn <iblackburn@gesb.wa.gov.au> wrote:
>
> If you want a (Unix-like) operating system that was designed
> with security in mind, you should use OpenBSD (which can be
> found at: http://www.openbsd.org).
>
> may be we can get too carried away everything to do with computer
> programming rellies upon human work so is likely to have some whole in it
> somewhere
That is true. Still, it is possible to program in a very safe
manner -- it requires more work than "normal" programming, but
it is possible.
The entire philosophy of OpenBSD is that security problems are
"bugs", and that good software should not have bugs in it. The
entire OpenBSD team therefore decided to make sure their OS
had as little bugs as possible. They audited the entire source
code for several *years* and keep on searching for possible
security problems all the time. Once a problem has been found
somewhere, they look for the same problem everywhere and correct
it if it appears anywhere else.
Finally, the OpenBSD team makes sure that very few services are
activated by default, and try to offer secure alternative to
unsecure programs. For instance, OpenSSH is designed to replace
"insecure" protocols such as telnet, rcp, and FTP.
This whole process results in a very secure OS. One which is *not*
perfect, but very secure indeed. You can check the "Errata" page
of the OpenBSD web site -- it's quite instructive to see there are
about a dozen patches *per year* for each version of OpenBSD, while
I constantly receive dozens of patches *per week* for Linux. And
I am not even going to mention Windows, where a single application
such as Outlook has to be corrected again and again to close basic
security problems.
So, is OpenBSD perfect? No. Is it better than most at security?
Yes.
_______________________________________________
Gil Andre -- Technical Writer -- Knox Software
gandre@arkeia.com
_______________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~ UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
has OpenBSD got access team working Ian Blackburn
` Gil Andre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).