From: philwh@gate.net
To: blinux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: talking terminals
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 22:25:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000822222554.A523@lpwh.pwh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20000822210821.007e5210@mail.ufw2.com>; from bharding@mail.ufw2.com on Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:08:21PM -0500
It should work over a modem.
I just plugged the serial terminal into com1, fired it up and loaded commo and jaws for dos.
I put the floppy into the drive, and puthe cdrom into its drive,
and booted the computer. at the boot prompt,
which i detected by listening for floppy drive noise, i typed the command
i mentioned below.
The only thing I could see wrong with a modem installation, is knowing when
to type the command.
phil
On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 09:08:21PM -0500, Brent Harding wrote:
> Would it do the same over modem? Did you put the CD in the machine to
> install on, or do you have to upload it off the machine you use as a
> terminal? What if I do it, substituting the port my modem uses? At 09:11 PM
> 8/22/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >I must say you are completely incorrect. I have installed linux
> >using a serial terminal dozens of times since 1994 when I started
> >with linux.
> >I have installed both slackware and redhat using a serial
> >terminal, the most recent last
> >friday afternoon when I installed
> >redhat 6.2 on my computer at work without any sighted help whatsoever.
> >just for anyone who wishes to know how,
> >at the boot prompt after booting the installation floppy from redhat,
> >type the following command to install using a
> >serial terminal, or more acurately a serial console:
> >text console=ttyS0,9600n8
> >or in my case since i was impatient,
> >text console=ttyS0,115200n8
> >
> >it worked without a problem.
> >
> >phil
> >
> >On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 07:56:03AM -0700, cbrannon1979@earthlink.net wrote:
> >> I was reading all the discussion about talking terminals yesterday. The
> >> way I see it, they have a very big disadvantage to a screenreader for a
> >> blind person with a hardware synthesizer. You need sighted help to install
> >> Linux with a talking terminal. And IMNSHO, a sighted person reading a
> screen
> >> for me is a very poor substitute for speech output, especially if you're
> >> like me, and don't
> >> know anyone in your area who uses Linux. I installed Zipspeak with
> absolutely
> >> zero sighted assistance. And as far as I can tell, kernels built with
> >> Speakup can do this for full distributions, as well. This would make
> >> Linux the only operating system that can be installed by someone who is
> blind
> >> without sighted help. Maybe I could install DOS on my own, if I'd done it
> >> enough, but I wouldn't have the computer actually talking to me while I was
> >> installing. And, with Speakup you get speech from bootup to power
> >> down. Only thing that
> >> won't talk to you now is the BIOS, and there's supposedly a board you
> can get
> >> that'll send the BIOS messages out the serial port. Compare this
> setup to
> >> Win-95, where speech isn't necessarily constant, even if you're booted
> and the
> >> screenreader's active. (JFW crashes so easy its sick.)
> >> But getting back to the topic of talking terminals. Anyone remember the
> >> old Apple II computer from the seventies? That's what I started out
> >> on; and I seem to remember that the synthesizer for those was only about
> >> $150, or so. Question is, if a blind person doesn't have a hardware
> >> synth, would it be possible to use an Apple II as a terminal under
> >> Linux? You can still find them, once in a while, and like I said, the
> >> synth was cheap, even new. I seem to remember them having a serial port,
> >> so I'd think they could be usable as talking terminals, for someone with
> >> limited funds who doesn't have, and can't afford a hardware synthesizer.
> >> Later.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Blinux-list mailing list
> >> Blinux-list@redhat.com
> >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Blinux-list mailing list
> >Blinux-list@redhat.com
> >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~ UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
cbrannon1979
` philwh
` Brent Harding
` philwh [this message]
` Brent Harding
` philwh
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0008220754340.513-100000@gondor.notarealdoma in.org>
` Brent Harding
` Count Zero
` tyler
` Brent Harding
` A. R. Vener
` Brent Harding
` Count Zero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000822222554.A523@lpwh.pwh.com \
--to=philwh@gate.net \
--cc=blinux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).