Emacs in X

Emacs in X

[Stoppard]

I was just woundering if emacs and also emacs speak will work under X?

Also what about X Emacs?

Thanks
Nigel

Emacs in X

[Sergey Fleytin]

Hello all!

>>>>> "S" == Stoppard  <stoppard@ntlworld.com> writes:

S> I was just woundering if emacs and also emacs speak will work under
S> X? Also what about X Emacs?


I tried emacs&emacspeak in gnome and had no problem runnig them. As
far as xemacs is concerned, i could not get it to work with emacspeak.

Best regards,

Sergey Fleytin.
S> Thanks Nigel


S> _______________________________________________ Blinux-list mailing
S> list Blinux-list@redhat.com
S> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

Re: Emacs in X

[Jude DaShiell]

T.V. Raman has got sawfish working with emacspeak and either xeamcs or
emacs and the latest version of emacspeak includes that support as well.
It's up to 19.x by now.

Re: Emacs in X

[Stoppard]

Hope he can get it working with meta city too.

Nigel
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
To: <blinux-list@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: Emacs in X


> T.V. Raman has got sawfish working with emacspeak and either xeamcs or
> emacs and the latest version of emacspeak includes that support as well.
> It's up to 19.x by now.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

Re: Emacs in X

[Jude DaShiell]

Yes, metacity is part of what he brings up too.



On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Stoppard wrote:

> Hope he can get it working with meta city too.
>
> Nigel
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
> To: <blinux-list@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Emacs in X
>
>
> > T.V. Raman has got sawfish working with emacspeak and either xeamcs or
> > emacs and the latest version of emacspeak includes that support as well.
> > It's up to 19.x by now.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Blinux-list mailing list
> > Blinux-list@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>

Re: Emacs in X

[Jude DaShiell]

What I don't know is what additional access all of this gets anyone using
emacspeak.  If I could get that much working on this redhat 8.0 box and
this is assuming the yum script is already installed I'd probably be able
to get bastille-linux working but that's not everyday software.

Re: Emacs in X

[Stoppard]

The reason for me asking was this.  I was thinking that if Carpurnicus
crashed then it would be useful to still have some access to the computer
just to shut it down or anything else.

Btw, i thought Basteal was a hardening program?

Thanks,
Nigel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdashiel@shellworld.net>
To: <blinux-list@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: Emacs in X


> What I don't know is what additional access all of this gets anyone using
> emacspeak.  If I could get that much working on this redhat 8.0 box and
> this is assuming the yum script is already installed I'd probably be able
> to get bastille-linux working but that's not everyday software.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>

Re: Emacs in X

[Jude DaShiell]

Yes Bastille is a hardening program which makes all of these requirements
on X that much more mysterious.