From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by listman.back-rdu.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hB9GomR13975 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:50:48 -0500 Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id hB9Gvr209674 for blinux-list@listman.back-rdu.redhat.com; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:57:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id hB9Gvr209670 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:57:53 -0500 Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id hB9Gvq207497 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:57:52 -0500 Received: from NigelStoppard ([80.5.207.39]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20031209165743.HQLY15813.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@NigelStoppard> for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:57:43 +0000 Message-ID: <001c01c3be75$6f908860$27cf0550@NigelStoppard> From: "Stoppard" To: References: <003f01c3bdb1$ac1c4220$ec776bd5@NigelStoppard> <004401c3be3e$e1580e00$4c776bd5@NigelStoppard> Subject: Re: Emacs in X Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:56:15 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Loop: blinux-list@redhat.com Sender: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com Errors-To: blinux-list-admin@redhat.com X-BeenThere: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: junk Reply-To: blinux-list@redhat.com X-Reply-To: "Stoppard" List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux for blind general discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: The reason for me asking was this. I was thinking that if Carpurnicus crashed then it would be useful to still have some access to the computer just to shut it down or anything else. Btw, i thought Basteal was a hardening program? Thanks, Nigel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jude DaShiell" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:10 AM Subject: Re: Emacs in X > What I don't know is what additional access all of this gets anyone using > emacspeak. If I could get that much working on this redhat 8.0 box and > this is assuming the yum script is already installed I'd probably be able > to get bastille-linux working but that's not everyday software. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > Blinux-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >